News & Media | In the News

The New York Times thinks only the rich should profit from crowdfunding


When Facebook purchased Oculus VR for $2 billion last month, many people got rich — just not the funders that helped get them to that purchase price.

The company, a mere 18 months old, got its market validation from a Kickstarter campaign. 9,500 contributors ponied up $2.4 million to preorder its virtual reality gizmo — another shining example of the power of the crowd to back initiatives they believe in. Yet none of these backers received a penny from the acquisition, because their support was in the form of donations and not investment.

Even though President Obama signed equity crowdfunding into law two years ago, which would have allowed these backers to own equity in Oculus and potentially profit handsomely, the law has yet to “go live” and permit average Americans from participating. If equity crowdfunding were available today, those backers might have seen a 400x return on their investment in 18 months. Hence, it is easy to understand why those backers would be upset.

But they shouldn’t be upset at Oculus or Kickstarter, which were following the current rules. Rather, Oculus backers should be upset at those delaying the regulations that will allow Americans to make their own investment decisions with respect to private companies like Oculus.

A March 29 piece called “How To Harm Investors” by the New York Times’ Editorial Board incorrectly used Oculus as a reason why debt and equity crowdfunding for unaccredited investors should be scrapped. The article calls the SEC’s proposed crowdfunding rules “a joke.” It says that “special interests” were behind the push “to end or loosen investor protections.” And it claims that companies do not have to “meet disclosure and accounting standards.”

Other than being hugely misinformed, the Times’ op-ed is a case study for why further delay in implementing Title III of the JOBS Act is bad for Americans, entrepreneurship, investors, and the economy.

Crowdfunding is no “joke”
First, this legislation was not hastily pushed through. It had its inception a full two years prior to being signed into law and went through multiple hearing in the House and Senate, revisions in sub-Committees, and to the floor for a vote. It was one of the only bipartisan pieces of legislation supported by both Congress chambers and the President in recent history. Rather than being backed by “special interests,” the crowdfunding language in the JOBS Act originated with the grassroots efforts of entrepreneurs, securities professionals, and legal experts to modernize outdated securities regulations that were crafted 80 years ago. These laws were written before most Americans had a landline telephone in their own homes. Today, we live in the age of Facebook and Twitter. Our securities laws and markets could benefit from the same real-time transparency those networks brought to the Internet.

Second, there is no “joke” in the SEC’s 585 pages of proposed rules. The SEC staff and commissioners have approached the regulatory process thoughtfully and we have great respect for the process and intent of the regulators. In addition to the White House, Congress, the SEC, and FINRA, industry and investor advocacy groups have been working tirelessly for the better part of two years to give the regulators the information they need to strike a proper balance between increasing the ease of capital formation for entrepreneurs and the equally compelling need for appropriate investor protections. This very thoughtful legislation “re-regulates” rather than “deregulates” how businesses can go about raising money. It sets forth a system and process whereby issuers that pass a background check can raise a limited amount of capital, and investors can take investment opportunities with a statutory cap on their risk. It embodies the two pillars the SEC was founded on: investor protection and access to capital. People seem to forget the latter.

Third, for the registered funding portals facilitating the transaction, the requirements placed upon them by the SEC and Congress are more stringent than the Times suggests. They may even be (as I wrote in a prior piece) a deterrent. As required by statute, portals will have to provide potential investors with meaningful education about crowdfunding and investing generally, about the illiquid nature of these securities, the risks associated with these kinds of deals, and the numerous risks (like dilution) associated with private market investing. Try to find that information when you click “buy” the next time you purchase a public stock. People will tell you it is there for you to find. But there’s a key difference: Investors must acknowledge an understanding of these risks when crowdfunding.

Fourth, for a specific venture, the crowdfunding portal has to perform mandatory background checks on the entrepreneur. They also require the entrepreneur to provide statutorily required disclosures (like a business plan, use of proceeds, and valuation) so that a potential investor can make an informed investment decision. This is more than what is typically required in the private capital markets.

This won’t be easy for issuers. It isn’t supposed to be. Raising money is serious and the proposed rules bring that home. Entrepreneurs will have a ton of work to do, and if they don’t complete it, portals can decline to list them. Even if they make it through, investors will make hay over questionable deals on the public comment boards — which is why there has been so little fraud in non-equity crowdfunding to date.

The Times piece claims “investors could end up with next to nothing even if they invested in the next big thing.” Thanks to the public markets and the global financial crisis, that’s what the American public has gotten for the past 80 years. Isn’t it about time that we try something new, something that leverages capital using the tools we use everyday to communicate? Isn’t it time we brought securities laws into the Internet age?

This op-ed was written in collaboration with several crowdfunding industry leaders, including Sherwood Neiss, Douglas Ellenoff, Jason Best, DJ Paul, Chris Tyrrell, and Kim Wales.

Why More Entrepreneurs than ever before Will Open Small Businesses in 2014

January 16, 2014 by 

Business owner Kim Wales, CEO of Wales Capital headquartered in New York is one of 67 entrepreneurs providing insight for 2014 Trends on Radius.  Common misconception says that small businesses–which account for the majority of businesses in the U.S.–make bad customers. Their small budgets don’t warrant the energy required for sales, keeping track of them takes too much work, and their inability to compete with big competitors often forces them to close. However, in the face of obliteration by an economic downturn and inaccessible capital, small businesses in America have thrived into the 21st century. What’s changed, and how can we foster our ever growing small business economy?

See the slideshow.


Kim Wales speaks with Money Radio on Crowdfund Investments

January 6, 2014

What a great way to start the New Year with Industry Pioneer, Kim Wales, headquartered in New York, NY speaking with Sinclair Noe on the Financial Review Show for “Money Radio.” Kim discusses the JOBS Act, Title II and Title III timelines, Innovation, Trends and Opportunities in the burgeoning new marketplace.

Thirty – Second Annual SEC Government – Business Forum: Kim Wales

The Securities and Exchange Commission held the Thirty Second SEC Government – Business Forum on Small Business Capital Formation on November 21, 2013.  Kim Wales, a sought after thought leader on the JOBS Act and Crowdfund Investing. Kim was invited as a panelist and provided a presentation that can be downloaded.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has conducted this forum annually since 1982. The event provides small business, their advisors, and their investors with an opportunity to share perspectives and views on a variety of topics important to them.  This is an effective way for the agency and its staff to learn more about the important capital formation issues that the small business sector is facing.

Click here for the Panel Discussion: Crystal Ball: Now that you raised money, what’s next for the company and the markets?


The Michael Dresser Show guest Kim Wales

Crowdfunding expert Kim Wales discusses the 2013 Global Wrap-Up for Crowdfunding and also talks about the Innovation Generation on December 18, 2013 with Michael Dresser.

Listen to Live Interview



SEC and FINRA Released Proposed Final Rules for Title III

Today, October 23, 2013 marks an exciting day for the alternative class of issues for Crowdfund Investments.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), unanimously voted during an impromptu scheduled Sunshine Meeting to release the Proposed Final Rules for Title III of the Jumpstart Our Business Startup Act (JOBS Act). It was noted that FINRA would also released Proposed Rules for Funding Portals and Form FP-NMA for public comment.  This move is in the right direction to begin putting in place mechanisms that create jobs and spur on capital formation for small emerging business as the JOBS Act was intended, given that unemployment nationally remains high at 7.2%. The proposal as outlined in the meeting included very similar rules to that which is currently in Draft Proposal.

In addition to ensuring the investor protections are in place for the crowd; the rules provide for methods in which the issuers and intermediaries will be able to conduct business.

It was noted that investors should be protected and have confidence that the market being created knows how to price the securities while being diligent in helping to prevent against fraudulent activities. Capital formation is a global process and when approached objectively, capital formation enhances confidence, promotes integrity and fosters market transparency. The criticality of each business owner, investor and intermediary to read and comment on the proposed rules will set the foundation for the development of this burgeoning Crowdfund Investing industry.

Along with investor protections being at the forefront in all comments, Commissioner Stein called for specific comments in three areas:


1. How much should an investor be able to invest? Which method should be used to determine such an answer, Income versus NET worth test?

2. Should non-US based Funding Portals be permitted to conduct business in the USA by registering with the SEC and FINRA?

3. What should Issuers responsibility be for tracking securities holder’s records? Specifically, what role could third party service providers offer to manage record holder information.

What should the public expect in the coming days?


1. The SEC will issue proposed rules for public comment along with 295 questions that have to be addressed by the public through the letter writing process.

2. FINRA will issue proposed rules for public comment as related to Intermediaries.

Note that the public comment period in each instance for FINRA and the SEC should be 90 days from the day the Final Proposed Rules are listed in the Federal Register in the case of the SEC.

For more information on the JOBS Act, Title I through VII, please contact Wales Capital, 212-736-6884,

National Minority Angel Network – Capital Formation

On, Thursday, September 26, 2013, the National Minority Angel Network (NMAN), in conjunction with Microsoft will host an event on the JOBS Act and Capital Formation with an expert Panel of Speakers,, David Wield, former Vice Chair NASDAQ/Co-Author JOBS ACT/ Chair & CEO Weild & Company, Kim Wales, Entrepreneur/Visionary/Crowdfunding Expert/ CEO. Wales Capital, Doug Ellenoff, Esq. – Strategy/Transactions/Corp. Financing/Member, Ellenoff Grossman & Schole, LLP, Daryl Bryant – Successful Serial Entrepreneur/CEO, StartupValley and Hudson Horizons, Ryan Feit – Entrepreneur/Investor/CEO & Co-Founder, SeedInvest, and Mike Norman, CEO & President, WeFunder.

Small business capital is vital to our economy. With the passage of the JOBS Act for Crowdfunding, a whole new era of capital is available to small business owners of every industry and sector. Under the revisions of the Securities Act of 1933, Crowdfunding allows business owners and entrepreneurs to access the public market to fund their business from several thousand dollars up to one million dollars. But not all forms of Crowdfunding are currently legal, most businesses use pledge or donation based models to raise capital which is legal. However, if you choose to sell securities (stock or units) or raise debt then you need to know the law for Title III funding. Title III funding will increase the amount of funding and number of investors from the current amount. Title III funding  can become one of the most important sources of financing in the 21st Century for minority and woman entrepreneurs who together only represent above 1% and 4% respectively of all Angel based investments in the US. This session will provide you with an understanding of all three forms of funding, how to prepare for raising capital, meet some of the leading authorities in Crowdfunding, and businesses who successfully raised capital from Crowdfunding portals.

Click to purchase your ticket(s).

Feliciano Center for Entrepreneurship – Crowdfunding

On Friday, September 20, 2013,  the Feliciano Center for Entrepreneurship will host an event with expert panelist on Crowdfunding – Latest Insight on Implementation of the JOBS Act – which will include crowdfunding laws and discussions will cover the series of regulatory changes happening this fall intended to make it easier for early-stage companies to raise capital.

The Feliciano Center for Entrepreneurship was created to enhance entrepreneurship education at Montclair State University by creating an environment where students unleash their talent for creativity, innovation and entrepreneurial drive.  This environment will provide students the opportunity to create and develop ideas that turn into real products or services and ultimately pitch those products and services to successful entrepreneurs.  Students will become entrepreneurs.

Speakers scheduled are: Zak Cassady-Dorion, partner, Crowdfund Capital Advisors; Kim Wales, founder of www.Wales, in Manhattan, and board member of Crowdfunding Intermediary Regulatory Advocates; Jonathan Sandlund, founder of; Douglas Ellenoff, member Ellenoff Grossman & Schole, a law firm with offices in Manhattan; and Daryl Bryant, founder of Startup Valley.

CF50 — Global Think Tank for Crowdfunding Leadership

NEW YORK, NY–(Marketwired – July 11, 2013) –  As crowdfunding becomes a viable capital-raising tool for startups worldwide, fifty leaders in the crowdfunding industry are uniting to create a think tank for the advancement of a global crowdfunding ecosystem. CF50 is a global nonprofit invite-only membership organization consisting of industry professionals, portal CEOs, academics, and policy makers who will carefully deliberate the direction crowdfunding takes as it becomes an internationally widespread practice. The recent lifting of the ban on general solicitation by the U.S. highlights the recent movements towards the democratization of capital formation.

The organization will convene at an annual global conference in which leaders are able to discuss highlighted issues and the future of crowdfunding. CF50 announced today that its leadership will consist of:  Read more:

Crowdfunding Champions of Change Ceremony

Washington, DC (PRWEB) June 03, 2013


The White House hosted Kim Wales, Founder of Wales Capital and Board Member of the Crowdfund Intermediary Regulatory Advocates (CFIRA) along with other distinguished crowdfunding industry thought leaders for the Champion of Change Ceremony on June 4th recognizing entrepreneurs using crowdfunding to fuel growth.

» Full news story